MGCY atMultistakeholder interactive dialogue with ICESDF, Monday 3 March

A lot has been said about different financing strategies. We strongly support many of these points specifically related to the illicit flow of funds and tax avoidance & havens. In order to add content to the discussion we would make the following points:

Screen Shot 2014-03-05 at 1.10.32 PM

Some may raise the question of such a step making progressive firms less competitive. In such a case we need to introduce barriers against socially and environmentally irresponsible practices.

This conversation also carries into the domain of tax reform. Ecological tax reform- Shift the tax base from value added (labor and capital) to “that to which value is added,” namely resource extraction and depletion, along with pollution. Such a tax shift prices the scarce but previously un-priced contribution of nature. Value added to natural resources by labor and capital is something we want to encourage, so stop taxing it. Depletion and pollution are things we want to discourage, so tax them. Ecological tax reform can be an alternative or a supplement to cap-auction-trade systems.

Such a reframing will in it self will encourage practices that promote SD, rather than the contrary.  This we believe also translates to the larger issue of viewing the economy as a subset of the environment rather than the other way around

Lastly we welcome the E-RISC (Ecological Risk Integration to Sovereign Credit) initiative lead by UNEP, which integrates a country’s ecological footprint into its sovereign credit rating. The same should be extended to specific, projects and private players.

Leave a comment